KONSTRUKSIVISME PIAGEAT: ANTARA EPISTIMOLOGI DAN PSIKOLOGI

Nurhadi

doi:10.53947/perspekt.v1i6.220

Penulis

Nurhadi Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53947/perspekt.v1i6.220

Kata Kunci:

Konstruksivisme, Psikologi Pembelajaran, Epistimologi, Kognitif, Constructivism, Learning psychology, Epistemology, Cognitive

Abstrak

Abstrak

Kajian ini ingin memperjelas posisi pemikiran kontruksivisme Piaget yang dalam beberapa literatur dianggap sebagai tokoh yang paling berpengaruh dalam pengembangan filsafat kontsruksivisme. Menurut Matthews bahwa upaya konstruktivis yang ditawarkan piageat dengan menghubungkan psikologi dengan epistemologi ditandai oleh ambiguitas. Catherine Fosnot dalam antologi konstruktivis menilai bahwa ciri menonjol dari konstruksivisme adalah watak komposit antara psikologi dengan epistimologi. Klarifikasi teoritis tentang konsep piageat ini menjadi signifikan untuk memosisikan konstruksivisme piageat sebagai teori psikologi atau epistimologi dengan berpijak ambiguitas Matthews atau Watak komposit Fosnot. Model analisis yang digunakan dalam kajian ini adalah Analisis teori, melalui analisa tentang kerangka dasar psikologis dan epistimologis, kemudian disesuaikan dengan pemikiran konstruksivis Piageat. Dalam kajian konsepsional ini disimpulkan bahwa kontsruksivisme piageat merupakan kerangka epistimologis filosofis yang mendasari skema pemikirannya pada sisi kognitif yang merupakan bagian integral dari teori psikologi.(komposit)

Abstract

This study aims to clarify the position of Piaget's constructivism, which in some literatures is considered the most influential figure in the development of constructivism philosophy. According to Matthews, the constructivist effort offered by Piageat by connecting psychology with epistemology is characterized by ambiguity. Catherine Fosnot in the constructivist anthology considers that a prominent feature of constructivism is the composite character between psychology and epistemology. This theoretical clarification of Piageat's concept becomes significant for positioning Piageat's constructivism as a psychological or epistemological theory based on the ambiguity of Matthews or Fosnot's composite character. The analytical model used in this study is theoretical analysis, through analysis of the basic psychological and epistemological framework, then adapted to Piageat's constructionist thinking. In this conceptual study, it is concluded that Piageat's constructivism is a philosophical epistemological framework that underlies his thinking scheme on the cognitive side which is an integral part of psychological theory. (composite)

Referensi

Theory, Perspectives, and Practice, 2nd Edition, (New York: Teachers College Press, 2005)

Denis C. Phillips, “Coming to Grips with Rad¬ical Social Constructivism”, Science and Edu¬cation, Vol. 6, No. 1-2 (1997)

Denis C. Phillips, “An Opinionated Account of the Constructivist Landscape”, dalam Denis C. Phillips (ed.), Constructivism in Education: Opinions and Second Opinions on Controversial Issues: Ninety-Ninth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Chicago, IL: National Society for the Study of Education, 2000)

Ernst von Glasersfeld, “Cognition, Construction of Knowledge, and Teaching”, dalam Michael R. Mathews (ed.), Constructivism in Science Education: A Philosophical Examination, (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 1998)

Ernst von Glasersfeld, Radical Constructivism: A Way of Knowing and Learning, (London & New York: Routledge Falmer, 1995)

Jean Piaget, Genetic Epistemology, trans. E. Duckworth, (New York: Columbia University Press, 1970),

Jean Piaget & B. Inhelder, The Psychology of the Child, trans. H. Weaver, (New York: Basic Books, 1969),

Jujun S. Sumantri, Filsafat Ilmu sebuah Pengantar Populer (Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan, 1988)

Laura A. King, The Science of Psychology: An appreciative View (Terjemah),(McGraw-Hill, Newyork 2007)

Margaret E. Gredler, Learning and Instruction: Theory into Practice, 6th Edition, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc., 2009

Michael R. Matthews, “Philosophical and Pedagogical Problems with Constructivism in Science Education”, Trema, Vol. 38, 2012

Michael R. Mathews, “Introductory Comments on Philosophy and Constructivism in Science Education”, dalam Michael R. Mathews (ed.), Constructivism in Science Education: A Philosophical Examination, (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998)

Michael R. Matthews, “Appraising Constructivism in Science and Mathematics Education”, dalam Denis C. Phillips (ed.), Constructivism in Education: Ninety-Ninth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000)

R.J. Hollingdale, Western Philosophy (London: Kahn & Averill, 1993), hal. 37

Rosalind Driver, “Constructivist Approaches to Sci¬ence Teaching”, dalam Leslie P. Steffe & Jerry E. Gale (eds.), Constructivism in Education, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1995)

Seto Mulyadi, Heru Basuki dan Wahyu Rahardjo, Psikologi Pendidikan Dengan Pendekatan Teori-teori Baru dalam Psikologi (Depok, Rajawali Pers, 2017).

Suradika, A dan Virgama. 2012. Filsafat Ilmu. Jakarta: Pustaka Mandiri

Webster’s New World Dictionary Of The American Language. (Cleveland and Newyork: The World Publishing Company, 1962)